Talk:CONSHA

From IHO Nautical Information Processing Working Group
Revision as of 11:22, 14 August 2008 by Jens (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Drafted by Western before SNPWG 6

agreed SNPWG8

05.11.07 Jens Although knowing that we have had strong discussions in the past I would like to recommend to delete the last sentence which might cause misunderstandings and to point the first sentence more to the hazards caused by shipping.

14.12. Jens A bit cleverer I would propose to use CTNARE (Caution area) as an existing object and add catsha when necessary

11.01. Jens M-3 work

DavidAcland 13:00, 13 August 2008 (CEST)

Tidied and simplified definition.

Jens, I have put the second sentence back in because we use "hazard", which could be quite a wide problem, in a fairly carefully calibrated way and I have not seen this definition published anywhere else.

jens 14:27, 13 August 2008 (CEST) I see the point, but why we need to establish a new object if instead the Caution Area CTNARE will fit our requirements too. We simple have to add the attribute, which is perfect, to CTNARE. What do think?

jens 13:22, 14 August 2008 (CEST)

Again. I didn't see the distinction to CTNARE. What is the difference between those two objects?


Submitted to Hydro register manager Date

Submitted to Nav register manager Date