Talk:CATREL

From IHO Nautical Information Processing Working Group
Revision as of 10:28, 7 October 2010 by Jens (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

jens 06:36, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Do we need excluded as well?

raphael 07:05, 27 August 2010 (UTC): If we have "excepted" I think not. Confusion may be my fault, I have probably used "excluded" and "excepted" interchangeably.

jens 09:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC) oops, my fault. I haven't checked the definitions and my translation was tending to German too much :)
Thanks Raphael.

DavidAcland 15:32, 28 September 2010 (UTC): Can we please now come to some decisions? I recommend the Alternative Definition and the Proposed Alternative Remarks, which is not surprising because I think I drafted them. Any other views?


jens 10:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC) copied from Raphael's email sent 4 Oct 2010
About decisions on CATREL: Since we prefer to use roles, CATREL should be deleted as an Attribute and turned into a Role; I can look up the S-100 way of describing Roles and propose a page template for Roles. I am holding back because the final model and wording might depend on TSMAD's reply to our email about roles and named associations.