Talk:RDOSVC

jens 15:11, 15 November 2008 (CET) Please can you check the work done?

DavidAcland 17:05, 24 November 2008 (CET)

In trying to follow the pattern of pltsrv and mrnsrv, I notice that we have not called either of these ... Area. We have just defined the service. I quite like the form "... place where a ... service can be obtained" and perhaps there is a case to reflect this back into pltsrv and mrnsrv.

DavidAcland 10:59, 2 December 2008 (CET)

Having thought a bit more about this, I now find my earlier thoughts were wrong. This Object does define the area and so I have made this clear in the Alternative definition. If you are happy with this please can you put this definition in place of the original.

I think that frqprs is also now finished

DavidAcland 22:41, 5 February 2009 (CET) Many attributes changed to remove Attribute type:A which is denigrated in S-100. Many changed to complex; some simplified to integer; frqprs changed to frqpar. Multiple pairs can be created by repeating frqpar. facssp changed to faxssp which is more intuitive.

jens 21:49, 12 February 2009 (CET)

most agreed.

faxssp drmspd, indcop; see discussion there

frqtxm and frqrxv were difficult to understand due to 00.0 resolution but I got it why they become integer; clever solved :-) .

obstim and timtrm is to be discussed again because ISO construction used for TIMSTA, TIMEND can be used instead