Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cntltw"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Jens 11.07.07 added to fit NEG request 24 Aug 07 Definition SNPWG8 Not finished WEG 12 Feb 08 This is an empty attribute; or should it contain a list of channels? Jens 25 Jul...) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
DA 26 Jul I agree. In the WEG, we wondered what would appear in the string. It seems to me that maintaining cntltw is either part of the procedure or it is a regulation. For example, this instruction or requirement would be one of the items in svaprc. | DA 26 Jul I agree. In the WEG, we wondered what would appear in the string. It seems to me that maintaining cntltw is either part of the procedure or it is a regulation. For example, this instruction or requirement would be one of the items in svaprc. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Jens|jens]] 14:29, 19 August 2008 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | changed to lowerCamelCase | ||
Revision as of 12:29, 19 August 2008
Jens 11.07.07 added to fit NEG request 24 Aug 07 Definition
SNPWG8 Not finished
WEG 12 Feb 08 This is an empty attribute; or should it contain a list of channels?
Jens 25 Jul 08 it is often being said that vessels should keep cntltw within a marine service.The information should not be limited to a specific radio method, the variations are too much. therefore string prposed
DA 26 Jul I agree. In the WEG, we wondered what would appear in the string. It seems to me that maintaining cntltw is either part of the procedure or it is a regulation. For example, this instruction or requirement would be one of the items in svaprc.
jens 14:29, 19 August 2008 (CEST)
changed to lowerCamelCase