Difference between revisions of "Talk:PILBOP"
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
[[User:Rmm|raphael]] ([[User talk:Rmm|talk]]) 08:22, 9 January 2018 (CET): S-101 DCEG 0.0.2 defines the feature Pilotage District instead of the attributes PILDST and NPLDST. At this time the GI registry contains both the feature and the attribute. Propose harmonizing with S-101 and removing PILDST and NPLDST from PILBOP. | [[User:Rmm|raphael]] ([[User talk:Rmm|talk]]) 08:22, 9 January 2018 (CET): S-101 DCEG 0.0.2 defines the feature Pilotage District instead of the attributes PILDST and NPLDST. At this time the GI registry contains both the feature and the attribute. Propose harmonizing with S-101 and removing PILDST and NPLDST from PILBOP. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Jens|jens]] ([[User talk:Jens|talk]]) 10:54, 9 January 2018 (CET) That is an harmonisation and I agree. | ||
Revision as of 09:54, 9 January 2018
Drafted by Northern before SNPWG 6
30.06.06 agreed SNPWG6
16.08.2006 checked DA
8.Nov.2006 checked Northern
SNPWG8 improve clapbp
14.01. Jens added dirctn; dstntn
14 Feb 08 WEG Changed clapbp to catpbp and agreed
12 July08 Jens agreed too
Submitted to Hydro register manager Date
Submitted to Nav register manager Date
--raphael 10:29, 20 March 2009 (CET)
S57 MD8 mentions new attribute CALSGN (which is also one of the attributes of condet)
jens 14:24, 20 March 2009 (CET)
Correct, that was forgotten. Although we might have this attribute available twice, I added to this object to satisfy S57. The duplication of CALSGN will not cause in the new S100 structure due to loose bindings between objects and attributes as we have it now with S57. That is why our approach offers more than only a list of objects/attributes. It offers the first approach to a ProdSpec too.
jens 13:52, 28 April 2009 (CEST)
chalim should be considered when developing the ProdSpec. At certain places the PILBOP depends on different vsl limitations
raphael 03:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC): Proposal for new attribute GMLLCN was moved to its own page.
raphael 03:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC): Just a note to say that the group is invited to consider adding bindings for attributes NTCTIM, PLTRQS and SVAPRC to PILBOP (in addition to GMLLCN, above). These suggestions are based on our experience working on data capture for the test examples of pilotge information.
Definition of CATPIL
raphael (talk) 07:11, 9 January 2018 (CET): CATPIL (categoryOfPilotBoardingPlace is not defined in the S-101 DCEG or the GI registry).
Proposed definition: Classification of pilot boarding place by method used to board pilots.
PILDST/NPLDST attributes and S-101 Pilotage District
raphael (talk) 08:22, 9 January 2018 (CET): S-101 DCEG 0.0.2 defines the feature Pilotage District instead of the attributes PILDST and NPLDST. At this time the GI registry contains both the feature and the attribute. Propose harmonizing with S-101 and removing PILDST and NPLDST from PILBOP.
jens (talk) 10:54, 9 January 2018 (CET) That is an harmonisation and I agree.