Difference between revisions of "Talk:OPERAT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: ~~~~: Ideas for a better name than OPERAT are welcome. The rationale for this variable and the reasons for not using "function" are at Talk:UKCVAR. I suggest the following addition to...) |
m |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
indicates that the under-keel clearance required is the greater of 2.5 metres or 10% of the ship's draught. | indicates that the under-keel clearance required is the greater of 2.5 metres or 10% of the ship's draught. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Jens|jens]] 06:16, 28 October 2009 (UTC) I agree. The remarks are useful. | ||
Revision as of 06:16, 28 October 2009
raphael 20:33, 27 October 2009 (UTC): Ideas for a better name than OPERAT are welcome. The rationale for this variable and the reasons for not using "function" are at Talk:UKCVAR.
I suggest the following addition to the definition:
Remarks:
OPERAT is intended to be used in conjunction with other sub-attributes of a complex attribute to indicate how their values must be combined in order to describe a condition. Example: The combination
UKCLRN (complex attribute)
UKCFIX=2.5, UKCVAR=10.00, OPERAT=1 (sub-attributes)
indicates that the under-keel clearance required is the greater of 2.5 metres or 10% of the ship's draught.
jens 06:16, 28 October 2009 (UTC) I agree. The remarks are useful.