Difference between revisions of "Talk:CATVSL"
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
If we see that for certain reasons the list must be extended we can come back to the proposal again. | If we see that for certain reasons the list must be extended we can come back to the proposal again. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Rmm|Raphael]]: I found a few places where there is a statement about a something applying to "towed or pushed units" over specified limits, but I did not find one that was not accompanied by a similar restriction applying to other vessels in general. So, OK, let's leave it for now and we'll revisit it if we find any special cases. | ||
| + | --[[User:Rmm|raphael]] 00:50, 2 April 2009 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 22:50, 1 April 2009
Drafted by Northern before SNPWG 6
DA 18.08.2006 Aligned with AIS attribute ship type shptyp; definitions and extended
9.Nov. 2006 changed definition for leisure craft; keeping the option to cover all size of leisure crafts
Needs work on list SNPWG8
DA 26 Sep 07 This list is based on a 1999 proposal which was not subsequently adopted. Propose abandon catvsl in favour of shptyp based on IMO (2003) and IALA (2004) guidelines for ship type in AIS.
Jens 11.01. If keeping valid the last entry can be deleted, the entry is given from the system for each attr.
DA 8 Feb 08 Propose delete
DA 2 Jul Following deleting of shptyp trying again with a more rigorous catvsl
25 Jul Jens added a general approach for dangerous cargo ‘ thinking we should give the list a try and built up examples how to use
DA 25 Jul Discussed by email
DA 29 Jul Reinstated catcgo, changed old catcgo to catdhc, and balast.
raphael 09:47, 31 March 2009 (CEST) May need an additional category for barges, towed or pushed units.
jens 20:37, 1 April 2009 (CEST)
At the moment I would reject Raphael's proposal. Rigorously interpreted, accepting this is likely the starting point for an endless list we intented to avoid. Barges/tows etc. may a construction of bulk/container/General cargo vessels depending on what is been transported.
If we see that for certain reasons the list must be extended we can come back to the proposal again.
Raphael: I found a few places where there is a statement about a something applying to "towed or pushed units" over specified limits, but I did not find one that was not accompanied by a similar restriction applying to other vessels in general. So, OK, let's leave it for now and we'll revisit it if we find any special cases. --raphael 00:50, 2 April 2009 (CEST)