Difference between revisions of "Talk:RSCSTA"

From IHO Nautical Information Processing Working Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: drafted by Northern before SNPWG 6 30.06.06 SNPWG8 needs more work Jens 14.12. did some work at CATRSC, believe RSCSTA is remaining unchanged DA. Agree in principle but we also need to...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
drafted by Northern before SNPWG 6 30.06.06
 
drafted by Northern before SNPWG 6 30.06.06
  
 
SNPWG8 needs more work
 
SNPWG8 needs more work
 
Jens 14.12. did some work at CATRSC, believe RSCSTA is remaining unchanged  
 
Jens 14.12. did some work at CATRSC, believe RSCSTA is remaining unchanged  
 +
 
DA. Agree in principle but we also need to remove PICREP which makes sense in view of Remarks. Suggest remove PICREP and then RSCSTA can go.
 
DA. Agree in principle but we also need to remove PICREP which makes sense in view of Remarks. Suggest remove PICREP and then RSCSTA can go.
 +
 
Jens 12.07.08 Once again the PICREP problem; I am thinking our initial was to present an picture of the available rescue facilities. Needed yes or no. Both answers will be followed by agreeing RSCSTA and let it go.
 
Jens 12.07.08 Once again the PICREP problem; I am thinking our initial was to present an picture of the available rescue facilities. Needed yes or no. Both answers will be followed by agreeing RSCSTA and let it go.

Revision as of 17:52, 12 July 2008

drafted by Northern before SNPWG 6 30.06.06

SNPWG8 needs more work Jens 14.12. did some work at CATRSC, believe RSCSTA is remaining unchanged

DA. Agree in principle but we also need to remove PICREP which makes sense in view of Remarks. Suggest remove PICREP and then RSCSTA can go.

Jens 12.07.08 Once again the PICREP problem; I am thinking our initial was to present an picture of the available rescue facilities. Needed yes or no. Both answers will be followed by agreeing RSCSTA and let it go.