Difference between revisions of "Talk:CategoryOfSchedule"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "--~~~~: Feedback: <br>''I would have thought categoryOfSchedule would be CATSCH or CTSCHD considering the pattern has typically been stripping out all vowels and using the fir...") |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
(I personally have no objection to either of the suggested alternatives. I think I may have picked CATSDL to avoid confusing it with something else which might be similar though not identical, but I don't remember what.) | (I personally have no objection to either of the suggested alternatives. I think I may have picked CATSDL to avoid confusing it with something else which might be similar though not identical, but I don't remember what.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Jens|jens]] ([[User talk:Jens|talk]]) 09:41, 23 January 2017 (CET) me neither. Best would be CATSCH to be in harmony with all the other "categories of ..." | ||
Revision as of 08:41, 23 January 2017
--raphael (talk) 09:31, 19 January 2017 (CET): Feedback:
I would have thought categoryOfSchedule would be CATSCH or CTSCHD considering the pattern has typically been stripping out all vowels and using the first three consonants (or a common triple consonant use)?
(I personally have no objection to either of the suggested alternatives. I think I may have picked CATSDL to avoid confusing it with something else which might be similar though not identical, but I don't remember what.)
jens (talk) 09:41, 23 January 2017 (CET) me neither. Best would be CATSCH to be in harmony with all the other "categories of ..."