Difference between revisions of "Talk:MBRSHP"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:Jens|jens]] 10:59, 11 February 2011 (UTC) I agree from the German point of view. They are not opposites. | [[User:Jens|jens]] 10:59, 11 February 2011 (UTC) I agree from the German point of view. They are not opposites. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Rmm|raphael]] 21:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC): Yes, the original intention was to model statements like these: | ||
| + | <br>Vesssels of more than 30000 gross tonnes or 150.0 m LOA must ... (regulation). | ||
| + | <br>Vessels of less than 300 gross tonnes are exempt from the regulations. | ||
Revision as of 21:31, 11 February 2011
DavidAcland 10:16, 11 February 2011 (UTC) I have thought about making this boolean but feel that it needs to be an enumeration because MBRSHP=1 and MBRSHP = 2 are not true opposites.
jens 10:59, 11 February 2011 (UTC) I agree from the German point of view. They are not opposites.
raphael 21:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC): Yes, the original intention was to model statements like these:
Vesssels of more than 30000 gross tonnes or 150.0 m LOA must ... (regulation).
Vessels of less than 300 gross tonnes are exempt from the regulations.