Difference between revisions of "File talk:Reg with different completeness.jpg"
(New page: ~~~~: Two questions about the diagram: 1. Is the duplication of GeospatialObject class in the diagram intentional? 2. The multiplicity of RUBRIC should be 0..* so we can encode none or m...) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
for REGLTS/NATINF object(s) mapped from section 4.6 of "Jussland Waterways and Ports" makes it easier for software to search (it can look for keywords in RUBRIC) and also format the results for presentation (it can use font size, boldface/italic, kerning, etc., as appropriate for the display). | for REGLTS/NATINF object(s) mapped from section 4.6 of "Jussland Waterways and Ports" makes it easier for software to search (it can look for keywords in RUBRIC) and also format the results for presentation (it can use font size, boldface/italic, kerning, etc., as appropriate for the display). | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Jens|jens]] 10:13, 10 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | Thank you Raphael for checking the file. | ||
| + | 1. yes, I thought S100 allows one information object to be used for several feature objects. | ||
| + | 2. yes, that sound reasonable. | ||
| + | |||
| + | You know, my UML skill is limited. I placed the [image:different_level_of_completeness.uml | file here]. You can correct it and upload the correct version. | ||
Revision as of 10:13, 10 June 2010
raphael 20:43, 9 June 2010 (UTC): Two questions about the diagram:
1. Is the duplication of GeospatialObject class in the diagram intentional?
2. The multiplicity of RUBRIC should be 0..* so we can encode none or multiple levels of headings for one item. For example, coding
RUBRIC=General Information
RUBRIC=Hazards
for REGLTS/NATINF object(s) mapped from section 4.6 of "Jussland Waterways and Ports" makes it easier for software to search (it can look for keywords in RUBRIC) and also format the results for presentation (it can use font size, boldface/italic, kerning, etc., as appropriate for the display).
jens 10:13, 10 June 2010 (UTC) Thank you Raphael for checking the file. 1. yes, I thought S100 allows one information object to be used for several feature objects. 2. yes, that sound reasonable.
You know, my UML skill is limited. I placed the [image:different_level_of_completeness.uml | file here]. You can correct it and upload the correct version.
