Difference between revisions of "Talk:NTCHRS"

Revision as of 20:21, 14 September 2009

jens 16:39, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

o.k. should we amend the measure to seconds or constructions allowing dd/hh/mm ? That would provide more flexibility.

raphael 20:21, 14 September 2009 (UTC): OK. I suggest requiring the time to be according to the ISO 8601 time interval (duration) format.

Revision as of 16:39, 14 September 2009 (view source) Jens (talk \| contribs) (New page: ~~~~ o.k. should we amend the measure to seconds or constructions allowing dd/hh/mm ? That would provide more flexibility.)		Revision as of 20:21, 14 September 2009 (view source) Rmm (talk \| contribs) m Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	o.k. should we amend the measure to seconds or constructions allowing dd/hh/mm ? That would provide more flexibility.		o.k. should we amend the measure to seconds or constructions allowing dd/hh/mm ? That would provide more flexibility.
		+
		+	[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] 20:21, 14 September 2009 (UTC): OK. I suggest requiring the time to be according to the ISO 8601 time interval (duration) format.