Difference between revisions of "Talk:SNPWG"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[User:Rmm|raphael]] 09:34, 12 May 2009 (CEST) : I think it might be useful to have an introductory paragraph or two describing the scope of the SNPWG model, i.e., saying what the model is supposed to do and what is not expected of it. The Terms of Reference do not say much more than develop guidelines for preparing nautical publications in a digital format compatible with ECDIS. For example, is the aim to list all possible categories of attributes, or just those thought to be most commonly used? (The latter, I'd say.) | [[User:Rmm|raphael]] 09:34, 12 May 2009 (CEST) : I think it might be useful to have an introductory paragraph or two describing the scope of the SNPWG model, i.e., saying what the model is supposed to do and what is not expected of it. The Terms of Reference do not say much more than develop guidelines for preparing nautical publications in a digital format compatible with ECDIS. For example, is the aim to list all possible categories of attributes, or just those thought to be most commonly used? (The latter, I'd say.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | (Update: Also, how literally to interpret the definitions - I just placed an example in the discussion page for [[Talk:ntctim|ntctim]].) | ||
Revision as of 07:40, 12 May 2009
raphael 09:34, 12 May 2009 (CEST) : I think it might be useful to have an introductory paragraph or two describing the scope of the SNPWG model, i.e., saying what the model is supposed to do and what is not expected of it. The Terms of Reference do not say much more than develop guidelines for preparing nautical publications in a digital format compatible with ECDIS. For example, is the aim to list all possible categories of attributes, or just those thought to be most commonly used? (The latter, I'd say.)
(Update: Also, how literally to interpret the definitions - I just placed an example in the discussion page for ntctim.)