Difference between revisions of "Talk:PILBOP"
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
[[User:Jens|jens]] 13:52, 28 April 2009 (CEST) | [[User:Jens|jens]] 13:52, 28 April 2009 (CEST) | ||
| − | [[chalim]] should be considered when developing the ProdSpec. At certain places the [[ | + | [[chalim]] should be considered when developing the ProdSpec. At certain places the [[PILBOP]] depends on different vsl limitations |
Revision as of 11:53, 28 April 2009
Drafted by Northern before SNPWG 6
30.06.06 agreed SNPWG6
16.08.2006 checked DA
8.Nov.2006 checked Northern
SNPWG8 improve clapbp
14.01. Jens added dirctn; dstntn
14 Feb 08 WEG Changed clapbp to catpbp and agreed
12 July08 Jens agreed too
Submitted to Hydro register manager Date
Submitted to Nav register manager Date
--raphael 10:29, 20 March 2009 (CET)
S57 MD8 mentions new attribute CALSGN (which is also one of the attributes of condet)
jens 14:24, 20 March 2009 (CET)
Correct, that was forgotten. Although we might have this attribute available twice, I added to this object to satisfy S57. The duplication of CALSGN will not cause in the new S100 structure due to loose bindings between objects and attributes as we have it now with S57. That is why our approach offers more than only a list of objects/attributes. It offers the first approach to a ProdSpec too.
jens 13:52, 28 April 2009 (CEST)
chalim should be considered when developing the ProdSpec. At certain places the PILBOP depends on different vsl limitations