Talk:Svcare

Agreed by SNPWG8

jens 19:02, 1 October 2008 (CEST)

That is a typical master/slave relationship between geo objects.

  first idea

Assuming my statement above is correct do we need CATROS and CATRA? Both are provided by the master objects. STATUS and RESTRN look also wrong, especially the latter one, although I think the first one too.

  second idea

If master/slave works we can also place the association to the contact details here and let the RDOSTA/RADSTA as they are. That supports Eivind's idea he told me in Brest. He wanted to keep the station which provides the technical equipment alone and separate the service area and the contacts. The contacts do not work necessarily at the location of the RADSTA/RDOSTA (e.g. being remote controlled); see also definition for RDOSTA/RADSTA, but works in any case at the svcare.

What do you think?

jens 15:43, 26 October 2008 (CET)

see also sta_discussion