Difference between revisions of "Talk:DYWKRN"
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
o.k. We will see what S100 version 0.0.4 offers. | o.k. We will see what S100 version 0.0.4 offers. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Rmm|raphael]] 08:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC): Looks like list values like "1,2,3,5,7" won't be allowed in S-100 compliant data. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Rmm|raphael]] ([[User talk:Rmm|talk]]) 04:53, 14 February 2017 (CET): Current GI registry [http://registry.iho.int/feature/view.do?recordID=2004161&page=1&type=3&status=2 definition] looks OK: 'A statement expressing if the days of the week identified define a range or not.' | ||
Latest revision as of 03:53, 14 February 2017
raphael 23:23, 24 August 2009 (UTC) : This attribute is defined for use with the suggested change to Talk:WKDYWK and new attribute DYOFWK. It is intended for coding ranges of weekdays in a compact format and staying within the letter and the spirit of S-100 concerning list values and complex variables. While the current version of S-100 (Version 0.0.3) does not make an explicit statement saying so, implicit suggestions in it and reports of past discussions in TSMAD suggest that encoding of list values (e.g., "1,2,3,4") will no longer be allowed (instead, repeated instances of the attribute are supposed to be used), that is, (roughly speaking) instead of
attributeA="1,2,3,4"
it would be necessary to code
attributeA=1
attributeA=2
attributeA=3
attributeA=4
The situation may change, so it will be worth reviewing this after any relevant updates to the S-100 draft.
jens 07:04, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
o.k. We will see what S100 version 0.0.4 offers.
raphael 08:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC): Looks like list values like "1,2,3,5,7" won't be allowed in S-100 compliant data.
raphael (talk) 04:53, 14 February 2017 (CET): Current GI registry definition looks OK: 'A statement expressing if the days of the week identified define a range or not.'