Difference between revisions of "Talk:TelcomService"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[User:Jens|jens]] ([[User talk:Jens|talk]]) 20:58, 22 January 2017 (CET) I could see that this might be an enumerate. But by making that an enumarate, we loose future flexibility if new technologies emerge. What would be "authoritative definition"? Is Webster not an offical dictionary? | [[User:Jens|jens]] ([[User talk:Jens|talk]]) 20:58, 22 January 2017 (CET) I could see that this might be an enumerate. But by making that an enumarate, we loose future flexibility if new technologies emerge. What would be "authoritative definition"? Is Webster not an offical dictionary? | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Rmm|raphael]] ([[User talk:Rmm|talk]]) 18:39, 23 January 2017 (CET): I think we should ask Jeff to clarify, perhaps he thinks the name should be "category of telecommunication service" even if it is a S100_codelist. |
Revision as of 17:39, 23 January 2017
--raphael (talk) 08:46, 19 January 2017 (CET): feedback from Jeff: More work required - authoritative definition and enumerations. Also, given that this is an enumerated attribute, suggest that it should be named "category of telecommunication service". Accepted in the interim.
jens (talk) 20:58, 22 January 2017 (CET) I could see that this might be an enumerate. But by making that an enumarate, we loose future flexibility if new technologies emerge. What would be "authoritative definition"? Is Webster not an offical dictionary?
raphael (talk) 18:39, 23 January 2017 (CET): I think we should ask Jeff to clarify, perhaps he thinks the name should be "category of telecommunication service" even if it is a S100_codelist.