Difference between revisions of "Talk:DGPSST"
(New page: Drafted by Northern before SNPWG 9 17.01.2008 WEG 13 Feb 08 Definition and attributes Submitted to Hydro register manager Date Submitted to Nav register manager Date) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Drafted by Northern before SNPWG 9 17.01.2008 | Drafted by Northern before SNPWG 9 17.01.2008 | ||
− | WEG 13 Feb 08 Definition and attributes | + | WEG 13 Feb 08 Definition and attributes |
+ | |||
+ | [[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 16:44, 13 August 2008 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I note that several countries include a five or six line note at the bottom of their country entry. I am assuming that this can go into TXTDSC. Please let me know if this is not the case. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Jens|jens]] 13:47, 14 August 2008 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I agree, if the entries are essential they can go into TXTDSC. | ||
+ | |||
+ | But David, to be honest and to discuss this as friends, who really needs this information? Have you ever checked what kind of bullshit is written there?. For a good example search for Canada. Is this helpful to explain that the service is now fully in operation? If that wouldn't be they would say on trial or planned or whatever. I think the time will come to check certain book entries for consistency and whether they make sense or not, and whether the are for the Mariners interest. Than, in the end, the mariner must read each of our entries in the one or the other way. We all know what an overflow of unnecessary information might cause. Das musste mal gesagt werden. | ||
Submitted to Hydro register manager Date | Submitted to Hydro register manager Date | ||
Submitted to Nav register manager Date | Submitted to Nav register manager Date |
Revision as of 11:47, 14 August 2008
Drafted by Northern before SNPWG 9 17.01.2008
WEG 13 Feb 08 Definition and attributes
DavidAcland 16:44, 13 August 2008 (CEST)
I note that several countries include a five or six line note at the bottom of their country entry. I am assuming that this can go into TXTDSC. Please let me know if this is not the case.
jens 13:47, 14 August 2008 (CEST)
I agree, if the entries are essential they can go into TXTDSC.
But David, to be honest and to discuss this as friends, who really needs this information? Have you ever checked what kind of bullshit is written there?. For a good example search for Canada. Is this helpful to explain that the service is now fully in operation? If that wouldn't be they would say on trial or planned or whatever. I think the time will come to check certain book entries for consistency and whether they make sense or not, and whether the are for the Mariners interest. Than, in the end, the mariner must read each of our entries in the one or the other way. We all know what an overflow of unnecessary information might cause. Das musste mal gesagt werden.
Submitted to Hydro register manager Date
Submitted to Nav register manager Date