Difference between revisions of "Talk:CONSHA"
(New page: Drafted by Western before SNPWG 6 agreed SNPWG8 05.11.07 Jens Although knowing that we have had strong discussions in the past I would like to recommend to delete the last sentence w...) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
14.12. Jens A bit cleverer I would propose to use CTNARE (Caution area) as an existing object and add catsha when necessary | 14.12. Jens A bit cleverer I would propose to use CTNARE (Caution area) as an existing object and add catsha when necessary | ||
| − | 11.01. Jens M-3 work | + | 11.01. Jens M-3 work |
| + | |||
| + | [[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 13:00, 13 August 2008 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tidied and simplified definition. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Jens, I have put the second sentence back in because we use "hazard", which could be quite a wide problem, in a fairly carefully calibrated way and I have not seen this definition published anywhere else. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Jens|jens]] 14:27, 13 August 2008 (CEST) | ||
| + | I see the point, but why we need to establish a new object if instead the Caution Area CTNARE will fit our requirements too. We simple have to add the attribute, which is perfect, to CTNARE. | ||
| + | What do think? | ||
Revision as of 12:27, 13 August 2008
Drafted by Western before SNPWG 6
agreed SNPWG8
05.11.07 Jens Although knowing that we have had strong discussions in the past I would like to recommend to delete the last sentence which might cause misunderstandings and to point the first sentence more to the hazards caused by shipping.
14.12. Jens A bit cleverer I would propose to use CTNARE (Caution area) as an existing object and add catsha when necessary
11.01. Jens M-3 work
DavidAcland 13:00, 13 August 2008 (CEST)
Tidied and simplified definition.
Jens, I have put the second sentence back in because we use "hazard", which could be quite a wide problem, in a fairly carefully calibrated way and I have not seen this definition published anywhere else.
jens 14:27, 13 August 2008 (CEST) I see the point, but why we need to establish a new object if instead the Caution Area CTNARE will fit our requirements too. We simple have to add the attribute, which is perfect, to CTNARE. What do think?
Submitted to Hydro register manager Date
Submitted to Nav register manager Date