Difference between revisions of "Talk:DateFixed"
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
SNPWG 8 agreed | SNPWG 8 agreed | ||
| + | [[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 11:41, 13 August 2008 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Although this is already agreed, I see from the S-100 draft paper [http://www.iho.int] Committees/TSMAD/S-100 draft and Comment Sheet, paragraph 5.2.3.1 on page 45 of the Feb 08 pdf version that we can have simple attributes with data type '''date''' . We could therefore move away from this structured text approach and use this new simple attribute data type. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Jens|jens]] 13:44, 13 August 2008 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | That is correct and I agree, the new type is being described in 5.2.3.1 in general and in 4.5.2 on page 25 in detail. The new attribute type has no commonly used abbreviation, therefore I propose to insert the word as type. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We should change '''[[tmstrm]]''' and '''[[tmsobs]]''' too. I don't placed a comment there. | ||
Submitted to Hydro register manager | Submitted to Hydro register manager | ||
Submitted to Nav register manager | Submitted to Nav register manager | ||
Revision as of 11:44, 13 August 2008
SNPWG 8 agreed
DavidAcland 11:41, 13 August 2008 (CEST)
Although this is already agreed, I see from the S-100 draft paper [1] Committees/TSMAD/S-100 draft and Comment Sheet, paragraph 5.2.3.1 on page 45 of the Feb 08 pdf version that we can have simple attributes with data type date . We could therefore move away from this structured text approach and use this new simple attribute data type.
jens 13:44, 13 August 2008 (CEST)
That is correct and I agree, the new type is being described in 5.2.3.1 in general and in 4.5.2 on page 25 in detail. The new attribute type has no commonly used abbreviation, therefore I propose to insert the word as type.
We should change tmstrm and tmsobs too. I don't placed a comment there.
Submitted to Hydro register manager
Submitted to Nav register manager