Difference between revisions of "Talk:LANGGE"
(New page: ~~~~: Language codes for use in multi-language datasets. See INFOML and Talk:INFOML.) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[User:Rmm|raphael]] 00:12, 25 August 2009 (UTC): Language codes for use in multi-language datasets. See [[INFOML]] and [[Talk:INFOML]]. | [[User:Rmm|raphael]] 00:12, 25 August 2009 (UTC): Language codes for use in multi-language datasets. See [[INFOML]] and [[Talk:INFOML]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 11:01, 12 August 2011 (UTC) Confusingly the Alpha-2 code is the older standard ISO 639-1. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Rmm|raphael]] 16:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC): I suggest specifying the 2002 version of ISO 639-1. This is based on the general principle (my own opinion, I do not know whether this is a S-100 modeling convention) that lists of allowed values should be frozen and updates to the list result in a revised version number; this to simplify update management for application software. (Not that it is likely to have any practical effect for this particular case.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 15:22, 5 December 2011 (UTC) Thank you. I have changed the page to "2002". | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Jens|jens]] 06:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC) I agree. But, I recall a SNPWG discussion that the language problem was planned to be solved by TSMAD. We should avoid to develop a second track on that. | ||
Latest revision as of 06:49, 15 December 2011
raphael 00:12, 25 August 2009 (UTC): Language codes for use in multi-language datasets. See INFOML and Talk:INFOML.
DavidAcland 11:01, 12 August 2011 (UTC) Confusingly the Alpha-2 code is the older standard ISO 639-1.
raphael 16:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC): I suggest specifying the 2002 version of ISO 639-1. This is based on the general principle (my own opinion, I do not know whether this is a S-100 modeling convention) that lists of allowed values should be frozen and updates to the list result in a revised version number; this to simplify update management for application software. (Not that it is likely to have any practical effect for this particular case.)
DavidAcland 15:22, 5 December 2011 (UTC) Thank you. I have changed the page to "2002".
jens 06:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC) I agree. But, I recall a SNPWG discussion that the language problem was planned to be solved by TSMAD. We should avoid to develop a second track on that.