Difference between revisions of "Talk:RDOSVC"
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 22:41, 5 February 2009 (CET) | [[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 22:41, 5 February 2009 (CET) | ||
| − | Many attributes changed to remove Attribute type:A which is denigrated in S-100. Many changed to complex; some simplified to integer; [[frqprs]] changed to [[frqpar]]. Multiple pairs can be created by repeating [[ | + | Many attributes changed to remove Attribute type:A which is denigrated in S-100. Many changed to complex; some simplified to integer; [[frqprs]] changed to [[frqpar]]. Multiple pairs can be created by repeating [[FRQPAR]]. [[facssp]] changed to [[FAXSSP]] which is more intuitive. |
[[User:Jens|jens]] 21:49, 12 February 2009 (CET) | [[User:Jens|jens]] 21:49, 12 February 2009 (CET) | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
most agreed. | most agreed. | ||
| − | [[faxssp]] [[ | + | [[faxssp]] [[DRMSPD]], [[indcop]]; see discussion there |
| − | + | [[FRQTXM]] and [[FRQRXV]] were difficult to understand due to 00.0 resolution but I got it why they become integer; clever solved :-) . | |
[[obstim]] and [[timtrm]] is to be discussed again because ISO construction used for TIMSTA, TIMEND can be used instead | [[obstim]] and [[timtrm]] is to be discussed again because ISO construction used for TIMSTA, TIMEND can be used instead | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 15:42, 13 February 2009 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks for these points. Now all covered. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Jens|jens]] 09:28, 4 May 2011 (UTC) We need to have a language information attribute. NAVTEX e.g. can be transmitted in English or national language. Shall I add [[LNGINF]] to the attributes? I will add it as a place holder now. | ||
Revision as of 09:28, 4 May 2011
jens 15:11, 15 November 2008 (CET) Please can you check the work done?
DavidAcland 17:05, 24 November 2008 (CET)
In trying to follow the pattern of pltsrv and mrnsrv, I notice that we have not called either of these ... Area. We have just defined the service. I quite like the form "... place where a ... service can be obtained" and perhaps there is a case to reflect this back into pltsrv and mrnsrv.
DavidAcland 10:59, 2 December 2008 (CET)
Having thought a bit more about this, I now find my earlier thoughts were wrong. This Object does define the area and so I have made this clear in the Alternative definition. If you are happy with this please can you put this definition in place of the original.
I think that frqprs is also now finished
DavidAcland 22:41, 5 February 2009 (CET) Many attributes changed to remove Attribute type:A which is denigrated in S-100. Many changed to complex; some simplified to integer; frqprs changed to frqpar. Multiple pairs can be created by repeating FRQPAR. facssp changed to FAXSSP which is more intuitive.
jens 21:49, 12 February 2009 (CET)
most agreed.
faxssp DRMSPD, indcop; see discussion there
FRQTXM and FRQRXV were difficult to understand due to 00.0 resolution but I got it why they become integer; clever solved :-) .
obstim and timtrm is to be discussed again because ISO construction used for TIMSTA, TIMEND can be used instead
DavidAcland 15:42, 13 February 2009 (CET)
Thanks for these points. Now all covered.
jens 09:28, 4 May 2011 (UTC) We need to have a language information attribute. NAVTEX e.g. can be transmitted in English or national language. Shall I add LNGINF to the attributes? I will add it as a place holder now.