Difference between revisions of "File talk:Reg with different completeness.jpg"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: ~~~~: Two questions about the diagram: 1. Is the duplication of GeospatialObject class in the diagram intentional? 2. The multiplicity of RUBRIC should be 0..* so we can encode none or m...) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 20:43, 9 June 2010
raphael 20:43, 9 June 2010 (UTC): Two questions about the diagram:
1. Is the duplication of GeospatialObject class in the diagram intentional?
2. The multiplicity of RUBRIC should be 0..* so we can encode none or multiple levels of headings for one item. For example, coding
RUBRIC=General Information
RUBRIC=Hazards
for REGLTS/NATINF object(s) mapped from section 4.6 of "Jussland Waterways and Ports" makes it easier for software to search (it can look for keywords in RUBRIC) and also format the results for presentation (it can use font size, boldface/italic, kerning, etc., as appropriate for the display).
