Difference between revisions of "RUBRIC"
(New page: ~~~~Nothing is proposed here. We have had discussed to idea at Talk:RXNCOD in length. I prefer to provide rubric as the attribute name allowing us to use it for NautInf as well. Usin...) |
m |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[User:Jens|jens]] 13:56, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Nothing is proposed here. | [[User:Jens|jens]] 13:56, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Nothing is proposed here. | ||
| − | We have had discussed | + | We have had discussed the idea at [[Talk:RXNCOD]] at length. I prefer to provide Rubric as the attribute name allowing us to use it for NautInf as well. Using RTITLE implies that the attribute is limited to Res/Rec/Reg. |
| − | + | If the discussion at RXNCOD comes to a final solution the attribute details can be developed here. | |
| + | |||
| + | [[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 13:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The word "rubric" does exist in English but it is not common or widely understood. In my dictionary it means "Heading of a Chapter or section" so that feels good. The dictionary also explains "...used to indicate conduct in a church service" and that this entry was often in special lettering or in red, hence "rubric". Latin - rubrica = red. | ||
| + | So my conclusion is that "heading" or "title" are both valid and probably better modern english words. However I favour something which would give a bit more of a general impression: perhaps "subject"? This might allow a briefer, even one word item, rather than trying to capture exactly the formal "Heading" of the law or the chapter or section, within it, which gave the ''reg''. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {| style="background:#ccc99; color:black;" border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" align="left" | ||
| + | !David!!Raphael!!others!!Jens | ||
| + | |- style="background:white; color:black" | ||
| + | |DA Y/N | ||
| + | |RMM Y/N | ||
| + | |others Y/N | ||
| + | |JSF Y/N | ||
| + | |} | ||
Revision as of 10:29, 5 January 2010
jens 13:56, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Nothing is proposed here.
We have had discussed the idea at Talk:RXNCOD at length. I prefer to provide Rubric as the attribute name allowing us to use it for NautInf as well. Using RTITLE implies that the attribute is limited to Res/Rec/Reg.
If the discussion at RXNCOD comes to a final solution the attribute details can be developed here.
DavidAcland 13:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
The word "rubric" does exist in English but it is not common or widely understood. In my dictionary it means "Heading of a Chapter or section" so that feels good. The dictionary also explains "...used to indicate conduct in a church service" and that this entry was often in special lettering or in red, hence "rubric". Latin - rubrica = red. So my conclusion is that "heading" or "title" are both valid and probably better modern english words. However I favour something which would give a bit more of a general impression: perhaps "subject"? This might allow a briefer, even one word item, rather than trying to capture exactly the formal "Heading" of the law or the chapter or section, within it, which gave the reg.
| David | Raphael | others | Jens |
|---|---|---|---|
| DA Y/N | RMM Y/N | others Y/N | JSF Y/N |