Difference between revisions of "Talk:CATNTC"
m |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[User:Jens|jens]] 14:27, 20 March 2009 (CET) | [[User:Jens|jens]] 14:27, 20 March 2009 (CET) | ||
| − | Good point. "precipitation" can be added. I think it is presented on one or another place. The "severe weather" should be kept pending. I am not willing to reject it now but I am also not convinced that we really need such a catchall attribute. Using E type helps to separate the information. L type might cause in the worst case that one could try to | + | Good point. "precipitation" can be added. I think it is presented on one or another place. The "severe weather" should be kept pending. I am not willing to reject it now but I am also not convinced that we really need such a catchall attribute. Using E type helps to separate the information. L type might cause in the worst case that one could try to create a list of attributes and put all information in one text file. That is what you said, the processing would became a nightmare. |
[[User:Jens|jens]] 14:41, 20 March 2009 (CET) | [[User:Jens|jens]] 14:41, 20 March 2009 (CET) | ||
can one of the Englishmen check the definition provided for precipitation?, Thanks Jens | can one of the Englishmen check the definition provided for precipitation?, Thanks Jens | ||
Revision as of 13:43, 20 March 2009
DavidAcland 17:48, 20 January 2009 (CET) I have reordered this item; removed "seabed"; and replaced several definitions with those found in The Mariner's Handbook and adapted one or two from elsewhere.
raphael 10:07, 20 March 2009 (CET) Suggest adding "precipitation" as a category. Another possible addition is the catchall type "severe weather" though I am less sure about this one. Would making it type L instead of E be a net improvement? It simplifies some encoding tasks but might make processing tasks more difficult.
jens 14:27, 20 March 2009 (CET)
Good point. "precipitation" can be added. I think it is presented on one or another place. The "severe weather" should be kept pending. I am not willing to reject it now but I am also not convinced that we really need such a catchall attribute. Using E type helps to separate the information. L type might cause in the worst case that one could try to create a list of attributes and put all information in one text file. That is what you said, the processing would became a nightmare.
jens 14:41, 20 March 2009 (CET)
can one of the Englishmen check the definition provided for precipitation?, Thanks Jens