Difference between revisions of "Talk:BERAST"
Tom.loeper (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Agreed WEG 12 Feb 08 | Agreed WEG 12 Feb 08 | ||
| − | + | 2008-08-24 Rolando: I think we could improve the definition since communications for example may be one type of berthing or manoeuvering assistance. As I am not a mariner, my opinion is just based on logic. | |
| + | |||
| + | [[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 11:23, 1 September 2008 (CEST) | ||
| + | Thank you Rolando. I have added "physical" before assistance. Does that tie it down enough? | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2008-09-01 Rolando: It sounds very good to me. I have made the change in the article page. Thank you David. | ||
| + | |||
Submitted to Hydro register manager Date | Submitted to Hydro register manager Date | ||
Submitted to Nav register manager Date | Submitted to Nav register manager Date | ||
| + | |||
| + | Looks good to me - I agree that it would be better to have physical assistance and not radio comms included for this object. Tom Loeper 12 March 09. | ||
Revision as of 15:06, 12 March 2009
Drafted by Northern before SNPWG 6
09.Aug. 2006/Jens added notice/ see comment box Amended notice to ntctim
DA 17.Aug2006 7.Nov. 2006 New comments inserted as an answer on Mals arguments Northern 8.Nov.2006
13 Dec 06 Agreed. New thought. Because catbas is type L, ntctim is E the result is ambiguous.
Jens changed attr. Type for catbas to “E”
SNPWG8 Improve def
Jens 05.Nov. 2007 improved def extended object name- I kept in mind, that catbas entries can do much more than only assist berthing operations
Agreed WEG 12 Feb 08
2008-08-24 Rolando: I think we could improve the definition since communications for example may be one type of berthing or manoeuvering assistance. As I am not a mariner, my opinion is just based on logic.
DavidAcland 11:23, 1 September 2008 (CEST) Thank you Rolando. I have added "physical" before assistance. Does that tie it down enough?
2008-09-01 Rolando: It sounds very good to me. I have made the change in the article page. Thank you David.
Submitted to Hydro register manager Date
Submitted to Nav register manager Date
Looks good to me - I agree that it would be better to have physical assistance and not radio comms included for this object. Tom Loeper 12 March 09.