Difference between revisions of "Talk:RDOSVC"
(New page: ~~~~ Please can you check the work done?) |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[User:Jens|jens]] 15:11, 15 November 2008 (CET) | [[User:Jens|jens]] 15:11, 15 November 2008 (CET) | ||
Please can you check the work done? | Please can you check the work done? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 17:05, 24 November 2008 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | In trying to follow the pattern of [[pltsrv]] and [[mrnsrv]], I notice that we have not called either of these ... Area. We have just defined the service. I quite like the form "... place where a ... service can be obtained" and perhaps there is a case to reflect this back into pltsrv and mrnsrv. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 10:59, 2 December 2008 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Having thought a bit more about this, I now find my earlier thoughts were wrong. This Object does define the area and so I have made this clear in the Alternative definition. If you are happy with this please can you put this definition in place of the original. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think that [[frqprs]] is also now finished | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 22:41, 5 February 2009 (CET) | ||
| + | Many attributes changed to remove Attribute type:A which is denigrated in S-100. Many changed to complex; some simplified to integer; [[frqprs]] changed to [[frqpar]]. Multiple pairs can be created by repeating [[frqpar]]. [[facssp]] changed to [[faxssp]] which is more intuitive. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Jens|jens]] 21:49, 12 February 2009 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | most agreed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[faxssp]] [[drmspd]], [[indcop]]; see discussion there | ||
| + | |||
| + | frqtxm and frqrxv were difficult to understand due to 00.0 resolution but I got it why they become integer; clever solved :-) . | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[obstim]] and [[timtrm]] is to be discussed again because ISO construction used for TIMSTA, TIMEND can be used instead | ||
Revision as of 20:49, 12 February 2009
jens 15:11, 15 November 2008 (CET) Please can you check the work done?
DavidAcland 17:05, 24 November 2008 (CET)
In trying to follow the pattern of pltsrv and mrnsrv, I notice that we have not called either of these ... Area. We have just defined the service. I quite like the form "... place where a ... service can be obtained" and perhaps there is a case to reflect this back into pltsrv and mrnsrv.
DavidAcland 10:59, 2 December 2008 (CET)
Having thought a bit more about this, I now find my earlier thoughts were wrong. This Object does define the area and so I have made this clear in the Alternative definition. If you are happy with this please can you put this definition in place of the original.
I think that frqprs is also now finished
DavidAcland 22:41, 5 February 2009 (CET) Many attributes changed to remove Attribute type:A which is denigrated in S-100. Many changed to complex; some simplified to integer; frqprs changed to frqpar. Multiple pairs can be created by repeating frqpar. facssp changed to faxssp which is more intuitive.
jens 21:49, 12 February 2009 (CET)
most agreed.
faxssp drmspd, indcop; see discussion there
frqtxm and frqrxv were difficult to understand due to 00.0 resolution but I got it why they become integer; clever solved :-) .
obstim and timtrm is to be discussed again because ISO construction used for TIMSTA, TIMEND can be used instead