Difference between revisions of "Talk:Catmpa"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: ~~~~ couple of the attribute IDs are similar to those at CATREA.) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
couple of the attribute IDs are similar to those at CATREA. | couple of the attribute IDs are similar to those at CATREA. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Cwinn72|Cwinn72]] 14:17, 30 December 2008 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | We discussed this at the MEPPSTG Meeting in San Francisco. At the time, the general consensus was that these enumerates would be moved from CATREA to CATMPA because these enumerates apply to MPAs. Now that CATMPA will not reside in the Hydro FCD I am unsure if this idea still has merit. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Cwinn72|Cwinn72]] 14:17, 30 December 2008 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | We cannot have redundant encoding, therefore a decision must be made as to where these enumerates belong. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Jens|jens]] 07:44, 6 January 2009 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | That looks fine to me. It will be the work of the register manager to discuss redundant entries. We will see what they decide. | ||
Revision as of 06:44, 6 January 2009
jens 15:50, 21 December 2008 (CET)
couple of the attribute IDs are similar to those at CATREA.
--Cwinn72 14:17, 30 December 2008 (CET)
We discussed this at the MEPPSTG Meeting in San Francisco. At the time, the general consensus was that these enumerates would be moved from CATREA to CATMPA because these enumerates apply to MPAs. Now that CATMPA will not reside in the Hydro FCD I am unsure if this idea still has merit.
--Cwinn72 14:17, 30 December 2008 (CET)
We cannot have redundant encoding, therefore a decision must be made as to where these enumerates belong.
jens 07:44, 6 January 2009 (CET)
That looks fine to me. It will be the work of the register manager to discuss redundant entries. We will see what they decide.