Difference between revisions of "Talk:WETFCA"
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 09:20, 26 November 2008
Jens 14.01. improved definition and obj name to fit warnings as well (ALRS (3/1) page 22ff added NATION to carry the relationship between catfca (3) and the responsible nation
DA 11 Feb 08 and WEG 13 Feb 08 Agreed
jens 19:40, 1 October 2008 (CEST)
do you think we will have forecast areas valid only for a specified period of time? I couldn't see why to carry restrictions
If you agree pls remove (((PEREND; PERSTA; RESTRN;))) from the article
DavidAcland 19:26, 24 November 2008 (CET)
I do not see a need for RESTRN.
However I can see PEREND and PERSTA being used for ICE forcasts and warnings. I think it is also possible that some forecasts are provided during the main leisure seasons in inshore waters for yachties. So I have tied up with this.
jens 10:20, 26 November 2008 (CET)
The working majority of the group agreed therefore RESTRN deleted.
I still have problems with PERSTA/END. I see your point but that is probably a wrong thought. The forecast itself can broadcast within a specified period of time. I wonder that the area designator should also have a limited lifetime. I am thinking, the area name specified by a category of area he was given for is valid all over the year. The mariner may expect a kind of weather report in a specified time period. I know from discussions with the Canadians that it is extremely difficult to change forecast areas because they are "burned" in the users' mind.
What do you think?