Difference between revisions of "Talk:SRVMED"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
principally agreed and signed, but should we keep this open as candidate for a list type (for the case that the list will be extended) or is a boolean? | principally agreed and signed, but should we keep this open as candidate for a list type (for the case that the list will be extended) or is a boolean? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 15:22, 27 October 2008 (CET) I know it looks odd at the moment as a list with one item, but I do feel that it is more useful as an open list that could be extended. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Jens|jens]] 14:42, 15 November 2008 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | jo, a boolean may limit the further extension too much. I agree, sign and forget. | ||
Revision as of 13:42, 15 November 2008
Drafted by Northern before SNPWG 6
Agreed by SNPWG9
jens 14:39, 30 September 2008 (CEST)
principally agreed and signed, but should we keep this open as candidate for a list type (for the case that the list will be extended) or is a boolean?
DavidAcland 15:22, 27 October 2008 (CET) I know it looks odd at the moment as a list with one item, but I do feel that it is more useful as an open list that could be extended.
jens 14:42, 15 November 2008 (CET)
jo, a boolean may limit the further extension too much. I agree, sign and forget.
Submitted to Hydro register manager Date
Submitted to Nav register manager Date