Talk:WATARE - Revision history

Rmm at 16:13, 9 January 2018

2018-01-09T16:13:35Z

Jens at 09:36, 9 January 2018

2018-01-09T09:36:00Z

Rmm at 19:33, 2 January 2018

2018-01-02T19:33:00Z

Rmm at 19:29, 2 January 2018

2018-01-02T19:29:51Z

Jens at 12:22, 7 August 2010

2010-08-07T12:22:26Z

Jens at 04:50, 8 October 2009

2009-10-08T04:50:46Z

Jens: New page: ~~~~ Result of investigations for waterway ProdSpec

2009-09-02T08:57:10Z

New page: ~~~~ Result of investigations for waterway ProdSpec

New page

[[User:Jens|jens]] 08:57, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Result of investigations for waterway ProdSpec

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:13, 9 January 2018
Line 14:		Line 14:

	[[User:Jens\|jens]] ([[User talk:Jens\|talk]]) 10:36, 9 January 2018 (CET) I would tend to agree. What I learnt is that the registry could have two similar entries with different definitions. Important is that they are not in the same register. <br> However, the intention of a waterway was to provide information which cannot/should not be provided to specific charted entries such as SEAARE. <br> I have no objections against the InlandENC definition and the feature could be reused.		[[User:Jens\|jens]] ([[User talk:Jens\|talk]]) 10:36, 9 January 2018 (CET) I would tend to agree. What I learnt is that the registry could have two similar entries with different definitions. Important is that they are not in the same register. <br> However, the intention of a waterway was to provide information which cannot/should not be provided to specific charted entries such as SEAARE. <br> I have no objections against the InlandENC definition and the feature could be reused.
		+
		+	[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] ([[User talk:Rmm\|talk]]) 17:13, 9 January 2018 (CET): I too have no strong views on it, but the NIPWG definition is the same as the IHO Hydrographic dictionary definition of [http://hd.iho.int/en/index.php/waterway Waterway] and therefore more "standard". I think we put the question to Jeff and see. It's possible that when the registry is overhauled the IENC definition might be superseded by the Hydrographic Dictionary ans we have to change back.
		+
		+	Let's use the current Wiki definition in S-127, and see what happens to Waterway Area in the registry this summer.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:36, 9 January 2018
Line 12:		Line 12:

	[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] ([[User talk:Rmm\|talk]]) 20:29, 2 January 2018 (CET): Needs to be harmonized with, or distinguished from, the Inland ENC feature WaterwayArea (wtware) defined in the GI registry as "An area in which uniform general information of the waterway exists".		[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] ([[User talk:Rmm\|talk]]) 20:29, 2 January 2018 (CET): Needs to be harmonized with, or distinguished from, the Inland ENC feature WaterwayArea (wtware) defined in the GI registry as "An area in which uniform general information of the waterway exists".
		+
		+	[[User:Jens\|jens]] ([[User talk:Jens\|talk]]) 10:36, 9 January 2018 (CET) I would tend to agree. What I learnt is that the registry could have two similar entries with different definitions. Important is that they are not in the same register. <br> However, the intention of a waterway was to provide information which cannot/should not be provided to specific charted entries such as SEAARE. <br> I have no objections against the InlandENC definition and the feature could be reused.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:33, 2 January 2018
Line 11:		Line 11:
	[[User:Jens\|jens]] 12:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)replaced [[CHALIM]] by [[APPLIC]]		[[User:Jens\|jens]] 12:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)replaced [[CHALIM]] by [[APPLIC]]

−	[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] ([[User talk:Rmm\|talk]]) 20:29, 2 January 2018 (CET): Needs to be harmonized with, or distinguished from, the Inland ENC feature WaterwayArea (defined as "An area in which uniform general information of the waterway exists".	+	[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] ([[User talk:Rmm\|talk]]) 20:29, 2 January 2018 (CET): Needs to be harmonized with, or distinguished from, the Inland ENC feature WaterwayArea (wtware) defined in the GI registry as "An area in which uniform general information of the waterway exists".

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:29, 2 January 2018
Line 10:		Line 10:

	[[User:Jens\|jens]] 12:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)replaced [[CHALIM]] by [[APPLIC]]		[[User:Jens\|jens]] 12:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)replaced [[CHALIM]] by [[APPLIC]]
		+
		+	[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] ([[User talk:Rmm\|talk]]) 20:29, 2 January 2018 (CET): Needs to be harmonized with, or distinguished from, the Inland ENC feature WaterwayArea (defined as "An area in which uniform general information of the waterway exists".

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:22, 7 August 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	# the attribute has had no feature to which it was accompanied		# the attribute has had no feature to which it was accompanied
	# the string is a perfect way to describe siltation verbally if not having any particular details on hand. In that way it can work with waterway area because it has no influence on the charted details. That follows the philosophy of waterway area, keeping chartable details out of NPUB domain.		# the string is a perfect way to describe siltation verbally if not having any particular details on hand. In that way it can work with waterway area because it has no influence on the charted details. That follows the philosophy of waterway area, keeping chartable details out of NPUB domain.
		+
		+	[[User:Jens\|jens]] 12:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)replaced [[CHALIM]] by [[APPLIC]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:50, 8 October 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Result of investigations for waterway ProdSpec		Result of investigations for waterway ProdSpec
		+
		+	[[User:Jens\|jens]] 04:50, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	added siltation here for two reasons:
		+	# the attribute has had no feature to which it was accompanied
		+	# the string is a perfect way to describe siltation verbally if not having any particular details on hand. In that way it can work with waterway area because it has no influence on the charted details. That follows the philosophy of waterway area, keeping chartable details out of NPUB domain.