Talk:RSCSTA - Revision history

Jens at 11:19, 17 March 2009

2009-03-17T11:19:40Z

Jens at 09:52, 13 March 2009

2009-03-13T09:52:29Z

Tom.loeper at 19:01, 12 March 2009

2009-03-12T19:01:29Z

Jens at 18:38, 2 March 2009

2009-03-02T18:38:55Z

New page

drafted by Northern before SNPWG 6 30.06.06

SNPWG8 needs more work
Jens 14.12. did some work at CATRSC, believe RSCSTA is remaining unchanged

DA. Agree in principle but we also need to remove PICREP which makes sense in view of Remarks. Suggest remove PICREP and then RSCSTA can go.

Jens 12.07.08 Once again the PICREP problem; I am thinking our initial was to present an picture of the available rescue facilities. Needed yes or no. Both answers will be followed by agreeing RSCSTA and let it go.

[[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 03:09, 2 March 2009 (CET)

See comments at [[catrsc]]

[[User:Jens|jens]] 19:38, 2 March 2009 (CET)

He David, what you are doing here? You should be skiing.

I notice no [[catrsc]] page so far. Was it a mistake or do you intent to produce some content?

Jens at 17:52, 12 July 2008

2008-07-12T17:52:57Z

Jens: New page: drafted by Northern before SNPWG 6 30.06.06 SNPWG8 needs more work Jens 14.12. did some work at CATRSC, believe RSCSTA is remaining unchanged DA. Agree in principle but we also need to...

2008-07-12T17:52:37Z

New page: drafted by Northern before SNPWG 6 30.06.06 SNPWG8 needs more work Jens 14.12. did some work at CATRSC, believe RSCSTA is remaining unchanged DA. Agree in principle but we also need to...

New page

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:19, 17 March 2009
Line 28:		Line 28:
	Receiving substantial objections against the deletion we can discuss it once again.		Receiving substantial objections against the deletion we can discuss it once again.

−	And Tom, give us a favour and try to put your "Tom and the date" in ~~fromt~~ of your submission. Pls refer to help page how it works.	+	And Tom, give us a favour and try to put your "Tom and the date" in front of your submission. Pls refer to help page how it works.
		+
		+	[[User:Jens\|jens]] 12:19, 17 March 2009 (CET)
		+
		+	Putted PICREP in. That based on discussion between Tom and David, attached.
		+	"Most of us do not need the PICREP but some MS do have photos of their Stations, hence PICREP. No harm done in keeping it in."

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:52, 13 March 2009
Line 19:		Line 19:

	Is there really a need for a picture here? I guess if you guys have them it is fine but we don't have any pictures of rescue stations. Tom Loeper - 12 March 09		Is there really a need for a picture here? I guess if you guys have them it is fine but we don't have any pictures of rescue stations. Tom Loeper - 12 March 09
		+
		+	[[User:Jens\|jens]] 10:52, 13 March 2009 (CET)
		+
		+	Tom, apart from the [[catrsc]] discussion, it was initially proposed to provide the option to have a pictural presentation of the rescue facilities. Independently from the point of having those pictures or not, I think it is worthless for the mariner. He can never choose/select between two or ore rescue facilities. Crying MAYDAY one will send him help. In my opinion the PICREP can go. All we need is a common agreement.
		+	As far as I can see all participating parties are the opinion to delete PICREP and keep RSCSTA unchanged.
		+	I will take PICREP out.
		+
		+	Receiving substantial objections against the deletion we can discuss it once again.
		+
		+	And Tom, give us a favour and try to put your "Tom and the date" in fromt of your submission. Pls refer to help page how it works.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:01, 12 March 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:

	I notice no [[catrsc]] page so far. Was it a mistake or do you intent to produce some content?		I notice no [[catrsc]] page so far. Was it a mistake or do you intent to produce some content?
		+
		+	Is there really a need for a picture here? I guess if you guys have them it is fine but we don't have any pictures of rescue stations. Tom Loeper - 12 March 09

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 drafted by Northern before SNPWG 6 30.06.06
 SNPWG8	needs more work
 Jens 14.12. did some work at CATRSC, believe RSCSTA is remaining unchanged
 DA. Agree in principle but we also need to remove PICREP which makes sense in view of Remarks. Suggest remove PICREP and then RSCSTA can go.
 Jens 12.07.08	Once again the PICREP problem; I am thinking our initial was to present an picture of the available rescue facilities. Needed yes or no. Both answers will be followed by agreeing RSCSTA and let it go.