Talk:RDOSTA - Revision history

Jens at 13:47, 1 March 2014

2014-03-01T13:47:24Z

Rmm at 08:11, 27 February 2014

2014-02-27T08:11:04Z

New page

Associated geographic object: svcare; looks wrong for me. We haven't used such a construction now. The service area will be the geo-reference for this object.
What do you think?

By David,
I think a peer to peer relationship should be possible. I will ask James Ferguson, who is the modeller who has taken the lead since Peter left. Certainly we, that is Mal, Peter and I, had always understood that this was how it would work. I think that the same thing happens with NAVMET areas and NAVTEX areas that are covered by radio stations at VHF, MF and HF. In these cases we do not have a svcare; instead we have the NAVMET area or NAVTEX areas with a peer to peer relationship with the station that provides the coverage. If we do not think that the position of the NAVTEX station is important, could we have the information about these stations as attributes to an information object? that is an object without geometry? If we think that the position is important, should it be the position of the station building or the antenna if it is somewhere different? My guess is that very often it will be somewhere different.

By David 29 Jul 2008. Changed '''[[catmsi]]''' into '''[[catmab]]''' as catmsi is too narrow.

30 July Jens Seen that '''[[calnam]]''' is part of RDOSTA. That makes '''[[telcom]]''' indeed superfluous.

11 Aug David As '''[[calnam]]''' is now in '''[[condet]]''', removed from here.

[[User:Rmm|raphael]] 08:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC): Suggest adding [[TRMCTN]] as a fallback for types of broadcast/commnunication not enumerated in [[CATMAB]], on the same principles as in [[RDOSVC]].

Jens at 06:35, 30 July 2008

2008-07-30T06:35:37Z

Jens at 06:35, 30 July 2008

2008-07-30T06:35:07Z

New page

Jens: New page: Associated geographic object: svcare; looks wrong for me. We haven't used such a construction now. The service area will be the geo-reference for this object. What do you think?

2008-07-20T15:49:26Z

New page: Associated geographic object: svcare; looks wrong for me. We haven't used such a construction now. The service area will be the geo-reference for this object. What do you think?

New page

Associated geographic object: svcare; looks wrong for me. We haven't used such a construction now. The service area will be the geo-reference for this object.
What do you think?

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:47, 1 March 2014
Line 13:		Line 13:

	[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] 08:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC): Suggest adding [[TRMCTN]] as a fallback for types of broadcast/commnunication not enumerated in [[CATMAB]], on the same principles as in [[RDOSVC]].		[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] 08:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC): Suggest adding [[TRMCTN]] as a fallback for types of broadcast/commnunication not enumerated in [[CATMAB]], on the same principles as in [[RDOSVC]].
		+
		+	[[User:Jens\|jens]] 13:47, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Sounds good. I added [[TRMCTN]] to the list.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:35, 30 July 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:


−	30 July Jens Seen that '''[[calnam]]''' is part of RDOSTA. That makes [[telcom]] indeed superfluous.	+	30 July Jens Seen that '''[[calnam]]''' is part of RDOSTA. That makes '''[[telcom]]''' indeed superfluous.