Talk:CategoryOfSchedule - Revision history

Rmm at 01:43, 6 February 2017

2017-02-06T01:43:34Z

Jens at 08:41, 23 January 2017

2017-01-23T08:41:46Z

Rmm: Created page with "--~~~~: Feedback:
''I would have thought categoryOfSchedule would be CATSCH or CTSCHD considering the pattern has typically been stripping out all vowels and using the fir..."

2017-01-19T08:31:48Z

Created page with "--~~~~: Feedback: <br>''I would have thought categoryOfSchedule would be CATSCH or CTSCHD considering the pattern has typically been stripping out all vowels and using the fir..."

New page

--[[User:Rmm|raphael]] ([[User talk:Rmm|talk]]) 09:31, 19 January 2017 (CET): Feedback:
<br>''I would have thought categoryOfSchedule would be CATSCH or CTSCHD considering the pattern has typically been stripping out all vowels and using the first three consonants (or a common triple consonant use)?''

(I personally have no objection to either of the suggested alternatives. I think I may have picked CATSDL to avoid confusing it with something else which might be similar though not identical, but I don't remember what.)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:43, 6 February 2017
Line 5:		Line 5:

	[[User:Jens\|jens]] ([[User talk:Jens\|talk]]) 09:41, 23 January 2017 (CET) me neither. Best would be CATSCH to be in harmony with all the other "categories of ..."		[[User:Jens\|jens]] ([[User talk:Jens\|talk]]) 09:41, 23 January 2017 (CET) me neither. Best would be CATSCH to be in harmony with all the other "categories of ..."
		+
		+	[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] ([[User talk:Rmm\|talk]]) 02:43, 6 February 2017 (CET): Registry definition: Describes the type of schedule, e.g., opening, closure, etc. [http://registry.iho.int/feature/view.do?recordID=2004076&page=1&type=3&status=2 Registry link]

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:41, 23 January 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:

	(I personally have no objection to either of the suggested alternatives. I think I may have picked CATSDL to avoid confusing it with something else which might be similar though not identical, but I don't remember what.)		(I personally have no objection to either of the suggested alternatives. I think I may have picked CATSDL to avoid confusing it with something else which might be similar though not identical, but I don't remember what.)
		+
		+	[[User:Jens\|jens]] ([[User talk:Jens\|talk]]) 09:41, 23 January 2017 (CET) me neither. Best would be CATSCH to be in harmony with all the other "categories of ..."

Talk:CategoryOfSchedule - Revision history

Rmm at 01:43, 6 February 2017

Jens at 08:41, 23 January 2017

Rmm: Created page with "--~~~~: Feedback: ''I would have thought categoryOfSchedule would be CATSCH or CTSCHD considering the pattern has typically been stripping out all vowels and using the fir..."

Rmm: Created page with "--~~~~: Feedback:
''I would have thought categoryOfSchedule would be CATSCH or CTSCHD considering the pattern has typically been stripping out all vowels and using the fir..."