Talk:CATREA - Revision history

Rmm at 03:40, 13 February 2017

2017-02-13T03:40:24Z

Briana: noting Coral is now in registry

2016-08-29T16:56:12Z

noting Coral is now in registry

Jens at 05:04, 27 May 2014

2014-05-27T05:04:49Z

Rmm at 02:20, 27 May 2014

2014-05-27T02:20:42Z

New page

[[User:Cwinn72|Cwinn72]] 18:26, 25 February 2009 (CET)

that cause due to deletion of [[catmpa]]

[[User:Jens|jens]] 13:33, 13 May 2009 (CEST)

ESSA and PSSA have been added to S57 by Suppl. 2 published may 2009

coral sanctuary is still open

[[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 11:09, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

ESSA and PSSA removed in line with Jens' post above.

Coral sanctuary needs to be part of a general proposal of additions and ammendments from SNPWG to TSMAD for the S-101 feature catalogue.

[[User:Rmm|raphael]] 01:47, 4 May 2011 (UTC): TSMAD will probably ask for justification, and for "coral sanctuary" the question may be "why not use 4 - nature reserve or 22 - ecological reserve"?

[[User:Rmm|raphael]] 20:20, 4 May 2011 (UTC): More information via Eivind below:
<br>
My recollection is that ecological reserve (value 23) was not specific enough for coral reserve, and therefore a new value has been proposed. But if we don’t think it matters for ENCs, and we’ll just use this for MPAs, then this is not the place to propose this, it should rather go into the registry, and we’ll use it there for the MPA feature catalogue.

[[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 09:46, 13 May 2011 (UTC) I have been trying to discover if Coral sanctuary really exists or if it is just someone's good idea. So far I have not seen any reference to the types of MPA that we envisage in CATREA in the UNEPP and MPA discussions. I have asked Tom and Holly if they can throw any light on this.

[[User:DavidAcland|DavidAcland]] 14:33, 25 May 2011 (UTC) Heard back from Tom that this came from TSMAD. The protection of coral reef ecosystems was a major driver for the UNEP coming to IHO to get MPAs charted. See Craig Winn's report to TSMAD 17. http://www.iho-ohi.net/mtg_docs/com_wg/TSMAD/TSMAD17/TSMAD17-5.1_MEP.pdf
I think that this gives us enough to propose CATREA=29.

[[User:Rmm|raphael]] 02:20, 27 May 2014 (UTC): Coral sanctuary is not among the allowed values of CATREA listed in the January 2014 draft of the S-101 DCEG. Was it rejected by TSMAD?

Rmm at 20:20, 4 May 2011

2011-05-04T20:20:11Z

Rmm at 01:47, 4 May 2011

2011-05-04T01:47:14Z

New page

Jens at 11:33, 13 May 2009

2009-05-13T11:33:44Z

Jens at 11:33, 13 May 2009

2009-05-13T11:33:13Z

New page

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:40, 13 February 2017
Line 31:		Line 31:

	[[User:Briana\|Briana]] 16:52, 29 Aug 2016 (UTC) - Coral is now enumeration #31 in the [https://registry.iho.int/FeatureConceptDics/attributeFrames/add_current_detail.php?recordID=2000295&register=20 IHO Registry]		[[User:Briana\|Briana]] 16:52, 29 Aug 2016 (UTC) - Coral is now enumeration #31 in the [https://registry.iho.int/FeatureConceptDics/attributeFrames/add_current_detail.php?recordID=2000295&register=20 IHO Registry]
		+
		+	[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] ([[User talk:Rmm\|talk]]) 04:40, 13 February 2017 (CET): There is also listed value '32: recreation area'. I am tentatively including this in S-122.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:56, 29 August 2016
Line 29:		Line 29:

	[[User:Jens\|jens]] 05:04, 27 May 2014 (UTC)No, as far as I know it was not rejected. I'll put it on the "harmonisation list" .		[[User:Jens\|jens]] 05:04, 27 May 2014 (UTC)No, as far as I know it was not rejected. I'll put it on the "harmonisation list" .
		+
		+	[[User:Briana\|Briana]] 16:52, 29 Aug 2016 (UTC) - Coral is now enumeration #31 in the [https://registry.iho.int/FeatureConceptDics/attributeFrames/add_current_detail.php?recordID=2000295&register=20 IHO Registry]

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:04, 27 May 2014
Line 27:		Line 27:

	[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] 02:20, 27 May 2014 (UTC): Coral sanctuary is not among the allowed values of CATREA listed in the January 2014 draft of the S-101 DCEG. Was it rejected by TSMAD?		[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] 02:20, 27 May 2014 (UTC): Coral sanctuary is not among the allowed values of CATREA listed in the January 2014 draft of the S-101 DCEG. Was it rejected by TSMAD?
		+
		+	[[User:Jens\|jens]] 05:04, 27 May 2014 (UTC)No, as far as I know it was not rejected. I'll put it on the "harmonisation list" .

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:33, 13 May 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	ESSA and PSSA have been added to S57 by Suppl. 2 published may 2009		ESSA and PSSA have been added to S57 by Suppl. 2 published may 2009
		+
		+	coral sanctuary is still open

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:20, 4 May 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:

	[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] 01:47, 4 May 2011 (UTC): TSMAD will probably ask for justification, and for "coral sanctuary" the question may be "why not use 4 - nature reserve or 22 - ecological reserve"?		[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] 01:47, 4 May 2011 (UTC): TSMAD will probably ask for justification, and for "coral sanctuary" the question may be "why not use 4 - nature reserve or 22 - ecological reserve"?
		+
		+	[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] 20:20, 4 May 2011 (UTC): More information via Eivind below:
		+	<br>
		+	My recollection is that ecological reserve (value 23) was not specific enough for coral reserve, and therefore a new value has been proposed. But if we don’t think it matters for ENCs, and we’ll just use this for MPAs, then this is not the place to propose this, it should rather go into the registry, and we’ll use it there for the MPA feature catalogue.