Talk:BALAST - Revision history

Rmm at 23:12, 6 February 2017

2017-02-06T23:12:01Z

New page

Drafted by DA 29 jul 08

This is a new attribute, developed to provide the option to indicate for instance when different restrictions apply when vessels are carrying ballast water.

[[User:Jens|jens]] 11:21, 21 August 2008 (CEST)

This looks fine to me. I like the idea of putting it to boolean, gives us the chance to narrow the vsl characteristics by 0/1 approach.

One point, is it possible to have an empty vsl with no ballast? if yes, the definition should be corrected slightly.

[[User:Jens|jens]] 12:55, 23 December 2008 (CET)

I have spoken with an engineer who works with ships theory. He said that it is most unlikely that a vessel can sail with no ballast. Therefore accepted as a boolean

[[User:Rmm|raphael]] 22:17, 25 June 2009 (CEST) : This attribute seems to be missing from the list on the Feature Data Dictionary page.

[[User:Jens|jens]] 06:58, 26 June 2009 (CEST)

Thanks for spotting, it is arranged.

--[[User:Rmm|raphael]] ([[User talk:Rmm|talk]]) 00:12, 7 February 2017 (CET): Proposed definition: Whether the vessel is in ballast.

Jens at 04:58, 26 June 2009

2009-06-26T04:58:01Z

Rmm at 20:17, 25 June 2009

2009-06-25T20:17:56Z

Jens at 11:55, 23 December 2008

2008-12-23T11:55:46Z

Jens at 09:23, 21 August 2008

2008-08-21T09:23:24Z

Jens at 09:21, 21 August 2008

2008-08-21T09:21:15Z

New page

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 I have spoken with an engineer who works with ships theory. He said that it is most unlikely that a vessel can sail with no ballast. Therefore accepted as a boolean
+[[User:Rmm|raphael]] 22:17, 25 June 2009 (CEST) : This attribute seems to be missing from the list on the Feature Data Dictionary page.
 Submitted to Hydro register manager	Date
 Submitted  to Nav register manager	Date

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:23, 21 August 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:
	[[User:Jens\|jens]] 11:21, 21 August 2008 (CEST)		[[User:Jens\|jens]] 11:21, 21 August 2008 (CEST)

−	This looks fine to me. I like the idea of putting it to boolean, gives us the chance to narrow the vsl characteristics by 0/1 approach,	+	This looks fine to me. I like the idea of putting it to boolean, gives us the chance to narrow the vsl characteristics by 0/1 approach.

		+	One point, is it possible to have an empty vsl with no ballast? if yes, the definition should be corrected slightly.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:58, 26 June 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:

	[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] 22:17, 25 June 2009 (CEST) : This attribute seems to be missing from the list on the Feature Data Dictionary page.		[[User:Rmm\|raphael]] 22:17, 25 June 2009 (CEST) : This attribute seems to be missing from the list on the Feature Data Dictionary page.
		+
		+	[[User:Jens\|jens]] 06:58, 26 June 2009 (CEST)
		+
		+	Thanks for spotting, it is arranged.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:55, 23 December 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:

	One point, is it possible to have an empty vsl with no ballast? if yes, the definition should be corrected slightly.		One point, is it possible to have an empty vsl with no ballast? if yes, the definition should be corrected slightly.
		+
		+	[[User:Jens\|jens]] 12:55, 23 December 2008 (CET)
		+
		+	I have spoken with an engineer who works with ships theory. He said that it is most unlikely that a vessel can sail with no ballast. Therefore accepted as a boolean